Renowned former legal expert of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), John Reed Stark, has issued a compelling call to action. He urges the Department of Justice (DOJ) to awaken to the urgency of prosecuting individuals involved in crypto-based deception.

Meanwhile, Stark had a distinguished career at the SEC, spanning 15 years. He served as an enforcement attorney specializing in cyber-related investigations. Additionally, he contends that crypto wrongdoers boldly undermine regulatory oversight.

In sharp contrast to the SEC’s robust pursuit of enforcement, he laments the DOJ’s tepid response to fraudulent activities linked to cryptocurrencies.

The prevailing scenario, according to Stark, is nothing short of perplexing. He further underscores the dispositions exhibited by prominent entities and corporate players within the cryptocurrency sphere towards the SEC’s actions.

Notably, he singles out Binance, Coinbase, and Tyler Winklevoss of Gemini. While both Coinbase and Binance face legal actions initiated by the SEC, Stark asserts that these exchanges have chosen to wear the SEC’s lawsuits as some form of misguided honor badges, rather than approaching them with the gravity they deserve.

On the other hand, Tyler Winklevoss, co-founder of Gemini, dismisses the regulatory lawsuit against his firm as utterly unimpressive.

Key Developments and Controversies Surrounding FTX, and John Reed Stark Insights

Former External Legal Team of FTX Challenges Allegations of Involvement in Fraud

John Reed Stark emphasizes that the absence of DOJ intervention will inevitably result in a growing number of cryptocurrency enterprises treating SEC enforcement measures as mere inconveniences rather than binding legal obligations.

A point of contention arises in the ongoing litigation between FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried. Drawing on his expertise from his tenure at the SEC Division of Enforcement, Stark questions the absence of Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, Bankman-Fried’s parents, as defendants in the case.

Moreover, He suggests that they should, at the very least, be recognized as “relief defendants.”

Notably, FTX recently filed a lawsuit against Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, alleging that they exploited their familial ties and influence within FTX to divert funds from the company. Sam Bankman-Fried, former CEO of FTX, is scheduled to face trial commencing on October 3, following the collapse of FTX in November 2022.

The 31-year-old confronts multiple criminal charges and steadfastly pleads his innocence. During a previous altercation with billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban, Stark vehemently countered Cuban’s assertions regarding the SEC’s purported role in FTX’s downfall.

Instead, he staunchly defended the SEC, contending that the regulatory body had safeguarded cryptocurrency investors from potential losses amounting to millions, if not billions of dollars. Stark further argued that major cryptocurrency exchanges brazenly flouted the regulator’s directives, operating without the requisite registrations.

Read More:

Architect Financial Technologies Secures NFA Approval for Introducing Broker Operations

Base Surpasses Solana as Total Value Locked Approaches $400 Million