Gryphon Digital, a notable player in the world of crypto mining and blockchain solutions, is vehemently seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit initiated by its erstwhile collaborator, Sphere 3D.

The legal entanglement revolves around a substantial Bitcoin transfer tainted by fraudulent activities. Gryphon Digital’s defense hinges on its assertion that the entire incident transpired due to the security inadequacies on the part of Sphere 3D.

Background and Allegations

The origins of this legal saga date back to a spoofing attack that witnessed the transfer of a whopping 26 Bitcoins to an unauthorized destination. The attack was orchestrated under the guise of a trusted entity, leading to a significant financial setback for Gryphon Digital.


Sphere 3D’s initial complaint, filed in April, alleged that Gryphon’s CEO, Rob Chang, inadvertently transferred 18 BTC to an imposter posing as Sphere 3D’s chief financial officer. Subsequently, an additional eight Bitcoins were funneled to the same fraudulent address. This culminated in a colossal loss of over $500,000 during that period.

In a swift riposte, Gryphon Digital positioned itself as a victim of Sphere 3D’s “gross negligence.” The company contends that Sphere’s lax approach to safeguarding its technology infrastructure allowed a malicious actor to infiltrate its systems. Furthermore, this breach enabled the attacker to impersonate Sphere 3D and engineer the cryptocurrency transfer that saw Gryphon’s assets vanish.

The Mechanics of a Spoofing Attack

At the crux of this matter lies the concept of a spoofing attack. This manipulation involves a hacker masquerading as a trusted entity to dupe systems or users. These deceitful maneuvers can traverse various digital landscapes, including emails and IP addresses. The ultimate goal often revolves around unauthorized system access, data compromise, or redirection of activities towards malicious ends.

Sphere 3D’s Perspective and Gryphon’s Counterclaims

Patricia Trompeter, the CEO of Sphere 3D, minced no words in her take on the litigation. She accused Gryphon of endangering the company’s assets and flouting their contractual responsibilities.

An image of the counterclaims from US District Courts

In a legal salvo that seeks to level the playing field, Gryphon Digital has cast the spotlight on Sphere 3D itself. Gryphon’s counterclaims encompass breach of contract, negligence, and defamation. This move further broadens the scope of the legal tussle and portrays it as a two-sided affair.

An Unraveled Partnership: Past and Present

The lawsuit sheds light on the multifaceted dynamics of a partnership that commenced in August 2021. Gryphon was entrusted with overseeing Sphere 3D’s crypto mining endeavors, underlining the collaborative nature of the relationship.

Additionally, plans of a merger between the two entities were once on the horizon, with Gryphon poised to absorb Sphere 3D under its brand umbrella. However, the tide shifted dramatically, culminating in the decision to scuttle the merger by April 2022, ostensibly a mutual accord.

Read More:

Coca Cola’s Latest ‘Masterpiece’ NFT Collection Generates Impressive $543,660 in Revenue Over 3 Days

Shibarium Transitions to Private Mode for Enhanced Security