LiFi, the pioneer of multichain bridging protocol, has unveiled its groundbreaking multi-message aggregator. The unveiling ushers in a new era of secure and reliable governance in the realm of decentralized exchanges, lending apps, and other revolutionary Web3 protocols. This was disclosed by Arjun Chand, LiFi’s research lead, on August 17.
The launch of this aggregator marks a significant step in fortifying the defenses against governance attacks emanating from cross-chain bridges. This is as elucidated in the comprehensive documentation provided by the aggregator.
Bridge Security Debate on Uniswap Forums Spurs Innovation
The reason behind this development is because of the discourse around bridge security on the Uniswap forums in January. The outcome of this discourse was the consensus that no single bridge was endowed with the full spectrum of security attributes requisite for safeguarding secure governance.
Uniswap, a prominent cryptocurrency exchange, operates under the governance of a DAO known as UniswapDAO. In January, UniswapDAO initiated discussions regarding the deployment of a secondary iteration of Uniswap on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC).
This novel direction raised pertinent questions about the governance of Uniswap across multiple chains, since hitherto, all voting activities were confined to the Ethereum network.
Subsequently, on January 24, the DAO took a decisive stance to deploy a duplicate version of Uniswap on BSC. This was coupled with the decision to employ the Celer bridging protocol. It will help to facilitate the transmission of messages from BSC to Ethereum.
The Controversial Bridge Choice and The Triumph of Wormhole
Nonetheless, the adoption of Celer Bridge was not without its share of controversy. Concerns emerged among certain DAO participants, who harbored reservations about the efficacy of Celer in forestalling cross-chain governance attacks. Counterarguments were presented in defense of Celer as the most appropriate choice. This further adds a layer of complexity to the unfolding scenario.
Following the ensuing debate, a second vote was conducted on January 31 to decide the preferred bridge for governance. Wormhole emerged victorious in this decisive vote, securing its role as the designated bridge for governance.
However, the referendum exhibited a degree of divisiveness, with only 62% of Uniswap tokens utilized to cast affirmative votes. This stark contrast to the near-unanimous support or opposition observed in other UniswapDAO propositions underscored the contentious nature of the matter.
The discourse in the lead-up to the vote resonated with the idea that Uniswap should embrace a multi-bridge approach rather than relying solely on one. This strategic approach would inherently deter malicious messages originating from a compromised bridge, thus mitigating potential attacks.
Alas, the absence of a viable multi-bridge solution at the time necessitated the continued use of Wormhole until a comprehensive solution could be devised.
LiFi’s Trailblazing Solution
Fast forward to August 18, LiFi’s announcement signifies a pivotal moment in the domain of cross-chain messaging. Chand emphasized that the newly introduced bridge aggregator lays the foundation for a future-proof response to diverse cross-chain messaging requirements.
This innovation curtails the reliance on a singular bridge for governance messages. Thus heralding a new era of resilience and adaptability.
LiFi’s aggregator empowers protocols to enforce a stringent requirement for the validation of votes through the confirmation by two out of three bridges. This ensures robustness in the governance process, even in the presence of discrepancies between bridges.
Additionally, configurations can be tailored to leverage three out of five bridges or any other desired ratio. This will thereby, offer tailored flexibility to DAOs.
Read More:
Over $12M in Ether Drained as Optimism-Based Exactly Protocol Faces Hack
Curve Finance Commits to Reimburse Users, New Hack Surfaces, and ConsenSys Unveils L2 Solution