In a landmark ruling, a Manhattan judge has delivered a verdict that may significantly impact the legal landscape for cryptocurrencies. The ruling provides the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) the ability to pursue securities charges against Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon.
The judge’s determination that certain crypto assets are securities has introduced complexities in ongoing cases involving major players like Coinbase and Ripple. This ruling brings attention to the regulatory uncertainties surrounding digital assets and the potential implications for the broader crypto industry.
- A Manhattan federal judge’s opinion asserts that cryptocurrencies should be classified as securities, irrespective of their sales context, providing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) the ability to pursue securities charges against Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon.
- This judgment carries extensive implications for cryptocurrency legislation and litigation, shaping the legal framework surrounding these digital assets.
- Interestingly, this ruling emerges from the same Manhattan federal court that issued a controversial decision involving a crypto asset named ripple, which upheld the contrary perspective.
- The classification of cryptocurrencies as securities has been a point of contention among private companies, lawmakers, and regulators, leading to ongoing debates over their regulatory status.
Fraud Allegations Against Terraform Labs and Founder Do Kwon: Federal Judge’s Ruling
Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, are facing fraud allegations presented by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as confirmed by a federal judge’s ruling on Monday. This development follows their involvement in two cryptocurrencies that experienced a notable collapse, causing disruptions across global crypto markets in the preceding year.
Further, Kwon and Terraform Labs’ attempt to dismiss the charges alleging investor deception and the sale of unregistered securities, in the form of billions of dollars’ worth of digital assets, was denied by U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan.
Further, Terraform Labs responded through a company spokesperson, stating their intention to contest what they deemed as misguided and flawed SEC allegations. In contrast, the SEC refrained from offering any comments on the matter.
TerraUSD’s Fall and Deceptive Claims: SEC Allowed to Proceed with Allegations
TerraUSD, an algorithmic stablecoin designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the U.S. dollar, derived its valuation from Luna, another paired token. However, the value of both tokens plummeted when TerraUSD (UST) slipped below its 1:1 dollar peg in May 2022. Before this downturn, TerraUSD boasted a market capitalization exceeding $18.5 billion, holding the rank of the 10th largest cryptocurrency globally.
The SEC’s complaint alleges that Terraform Labs and Kwon misled investors about the stability of UST and propagated claims that their crypto tokens would appreciate in value. Moreover, U.S. District Judge Rakoff’s ruling enables the SEC to move forward with its allegations against the accused parties.
In contrast to a recent case involving Ripple Labs, where U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres concluded that Ripple’s XRP sales were not securities offers, Judge Rakoff diverged from this approach. The SEC attorneys associated with the Terraform Labs case have expressed disagreement with the Ripple case ruling and are exploring avenues for its review.
Moreover, Judge Rakoff underlined that the identity of the seller has no impact on the interpretation of statements made by Kwon and his company as a “promise of profits based on their efforts.”
Manhattan Judge’s Ruling and Its Far-Reaching Consequences For Terraform, Coinbase And Ripple Lawsuits
The Manhattan judge’s recent ruling on the classification of certain crypto assets as securities has sparked intense discussions among legal experts and industry stakeholders. With cryptocurrencies serving as a burgeoning financial asset class, regulators have been grappling with how to categorize and oversee these digital assets adequately.
Additionally, this verdict sets a precedent that could influence future cases and shape regulatory guidelines in the United States and beyond.
By designating specific cryptocurrencies as securities, the court has expanded the regulatory oversight on these assets. This classification subjects them to the securities laws and regulations, which include mandatory registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and adherence to relevant investor protection measures.
Consequently, companies operating in the crypto space, including exchanges like Coinbase and blockchain firms like Ripple, now face heightened scrutiny from regulators, adding an extra layer of complexity to their legal battles.
Coinbase and Ripple: Legal Ramifications of the Ruling
The ruling poses significant challenges for Coinbase and Ripple, two prominent entities within the cryptocurrency sector, as they confront ongoing legal battles with regulators. Coinbase is of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world.
Furthermore, it has been embroiled in a dispute with the SEC over its intention to launch a lending program.
Moreover, SEC contends that this program constitutes a security offering. Meanwhile, Coinbase maintains that it falls outside the scope of securities regulations.
In addition, the Manhattan judge’s classification of certain crypto assets as securities could impact the outcome of Coinbase’s case, influencing the SEC’s stance on other crypto-related activities and projects.
Read More:
IRS Declares Staking Rewards as Taxable Upon Receipt
Inauguration of Nonprofit by Bitcoin Ordinals Team to Propel Protocol Advancement